Samsung Electronics sent out a warning to its employees on the potential dangers of leaking confidential data within the wake of the incidences, saying that such data is not possible to retrieve as it is now saved on the servers belonging to OpenAI. Would you be all in favour of refining your argument right into a more structured piece that tackles these potential objections head-on? Your argument that this system is not a conspiracy but a ‘convenient convergence of interests’ among elites is especially nuanced, because it avoids oversimplification while nonetheless highlighting systemic issues. The emphasis on individualism, profit-driven motivation, and the marginalization of collectivist ideologies (like socialism) can certainly be seen as a cultural project perpetuated by elites throughout politics, media, and trade. For many who benefit from the system: Elites in media, politics, and business are unlikely to welcome such an analysis as a result of it exposes the logic that underpins their legitimacy. I've claimed, generally in a joking tone, that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are probably the most completed purveyors of hyperreality, but what they obtain is merely the surface of something extra complex, created and maintained by generations of elites in politics, the media, business, advertising, training and the arts who have willingly been drawn into its commanding logic and inculcated it in the final inhabitants.

What may those who really feel threatened by it level to as credible weaknesses? ‘This is simply anti-capitalist rhetoric.’ Critics may argue that your thesis is solely a veiled assault on free markets and individualism, dismissing it as leftist ideology.