Troubleshooting Variable Memory Grants in SQL Server > 자유게시판

본문 바로가기
사이트 내 전체검색

설문조사

유성케임씨잉안과의원을 오실때 교통수단 무엇을 이용하세요?

 

 

 

자유게시판

칭찬 | Troubleshooting Variable Memory Grants in SQL Server

페이지 정보

작성자 Lyle 작성일25-09-11 07:21 조회6회 댓글0건

본문

One of the extra perplexing issues to troubleshoot in SQL Server will be those associated to memory grants. Some queries need extra memory than others to execute, primarily based on what operations have to be carried out (e.g. sort, hash). SQL Server’s optimizer estimates how a lot memory is required, and the query should get hold of the memory grant in order to begin executing. It holds that grant for the duration of question execution - which means if the optimizer overestimates memory you can run into concurrency issues. If it underestimates memory, then you possibly can see spills in tempdb. SEMAPHORE waits. There are multiple methods to assault this situation, and one of my new favourite methods is to use Question Store. We'll use a copy of WideWorldImporters that I inflated using the DataLoadSimulation.DailyProcessToCreateHistory stored process. The Sales.Orders table has about 4.6 million rows, and the Sales.OrderLines desk has about 9.2 million rows. We will restore the backup and allow Query Store, and clear out any previous Question Retailer knowledge so we do not alter any metrics for this demo.



Store CLEAR; in opposition to your production database except you want to remove the whole lot from Question Store. The primary execution returns 1958 rows, the second returns 267,268 rows, and the last returns over 2.2 million rows. In the event you look at the date ranges, this isn’t shocking - the larger the date range the more data being returned. Because this can be a stored procedure, the input parameters used initially decide the plan, as nicely because the memory to be granted. If we look on the actual execution plan for the first execution, we see nested loops and a memory grant of 2656 KB. Subsequent executions have the same plan (as that’s what was cached) and the same memory grant, however we get a clue it’s not sufficient because there’s a sort warning. If we glance in Question Retailer for this stored procedure, we see three executions and the identical values for UsedKB Memory Wave Program, whether or not we have a look at Common, Minimal, Maximum, Final, or Customary Deviation.



Notice: memory grant data in Question Store is reported as the number of 8KB pages. If we're in search of memory grant points on this scenario - where a plan is cached and re-used - Query Store won’t assist us. However what if the precise question is compiled on execution, both due to a RECOMPILE hint or as a result of it’s ad-hoc? 5 there is only one execution, and the memory grant numbers match the initial execution - in order that plan is for the small date range. The 2 larger date ranges generated the identical plan, however there’s vital variability within the memory grants - 94,528 for minimum, and 573,568 for optimum. If we take a look at memory grant data utilizing the Question Store reviews,

추천 0 비추천 0

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.


회사소개 개인정보취급방침 서비스이용약관 모바일 버전으로 보기 상단으로


대전광역시 유성구 계룡로 105 (구. 봉명동 551-10번지) 3, 4층 | 대표자 : 김형근, 김기형 | 사업자 등록증 : 314-25-71130
대표전화 : 1588.7655 | 팩스번호 : 042.826.0758
Copyright © CAMESEEING.COM All rights reserved.

접속자집계

오늘
7,785
어제
10,002
최대
21,629
전체
6,608,821
-->
Warning: Unknown: write failed: Disk quota exceeded (122) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/home2/hosting_users/cseeing/www/data/session) in Unknown on line 0